<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Standard Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com</link>
	<description>How to File Personal Bankruptcy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://standardbankruptcy.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Resolving the Conflict: A Pragmatic Approach to the Appointment of Receivers as Provisional Liquidator</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/18/2012/bankruptcy-news/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/18/2012/bankruptcy-news/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/18/2012/uncategorized/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know... that the court may, in special circumstances, exercise its discretion to appoint pre-existing receivers as a company&#x26;rsquo;s provisional liquidators. Read More...  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/18/2012/bankruptcy-news/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know&#8230; that the court may, in special circumstances, exercise its discretion to appoint pre-existing receivers as a company&#x26;rsquo;s provisional liquidators. Read More&#8230;  <span id="more-1600"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/martindale/archive/2012/05/17/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator.aspx" title="Resolving the Conflict: A Pragmatic Approach to the Appointment of Receivers as Provisional Liquidator">Resolving the Conflict: A Pragmatic Approach to the Appointment of Receivers as Provisional Liquidator</a></p>
<p>Did you know&#8230; that the court may, in special circumstances, exercise its discretion to appoint pre-existing receivers as a company&#x26;rsquo;s provisional liquidators. <a href="http://www.martindale.com/banking-financial-services/article_Mayer-Brown-JSM_1513892.htm">Read More&#8230;</a>
<div></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/18/2012/bankruptcy-news/resolving-the-conflict-a-pragmatic-approach-to-the-appointment-of-receivers-as-provisional-liquidator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Company Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Citing Debt Of $325.7M</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WILMINGTON, Del. - Bicent Holdings LLC, a company that owns and operates power plants in the United States, on May 1 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, citing debt of $325.7 million (In Re: Bicent Holdings LLC, No. 12-11304, Chapter 11, D. Del. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WILMINGTON, Del. &#8211; Bicent Holdings LLC, a company that owns and operates power plants in the United States, on May 1 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, citing debt of $325.7 million (In Re: Bicent Holdings LLC, No. 12-11304, Chapter 11, D. Del. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1599"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/BANKRUPTCYLAW/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m.aspx" title="Power Company Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Citing Debt Of $325.7M">Power Company Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Citing Debt Of $325.7M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/power-company-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-citing-debt-of-325-7m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shutterfly: Automatic Stay Should Remain; Kodak May Not Pursue Patent Case</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - Online photo sharing company Shutterfly Inc. on May 9 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York opposing bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co.&#39;s motion for relief from the automatic stay, which it seeks to pursue a patent case against Shutterfly, contending that the only conclusion is that Kodak&#39;s motion should be denied (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; Online photo sharing company Shutterfly Inc. on May 9 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York opposing bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co.&#39;s motion for relief from the automatic stay, which it seeks to pursue a patent case against Shutterfly, contending that the only conclusion is that Kodak&#39;s motion should be denied (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1598"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/BANKRUPTCYLAW/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case.aspx" title="Shutterfly: Automatic Stay Should Remain; Kodak May Not Pursue Patent Case">Shutterfly: Automatic Stay Should Remain; Kodak May Not Pursue Patent Case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/shutterfly-automatic-stay-should-remain-kodak-may-not-pursue-patent-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak Seeks Stay Relief To Pursue Patent Action Worth $100M To Bankruptcy Estate</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - Bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co. on April 30 moved in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to modify the automatic stay to permit it to pursue a patent infringement action, which it contends will result in $100 million being added to its bankruptcy estate (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; Bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co. on April 30 moved in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to modify the automatic stay to permit it to pursue a patent infringement action, which it contends will result in $100 million being added to its bankruptcy estate (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1597"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/BANKRUPTCYLAW/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate.aspx" title="Kodak Seeks Stay Relief To Pursue Patent Action Worth $100M To Bankruptcy Estate">Kodak Seeks Stay Relief To Pursue Patent Action Worth $100M To Bankruptcy Estate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-seeks-stay-relief-to-pursue-patent-action-worth-100m-to-bankruptcy-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak Objects To Lifting Of Automatic Stay To Allow State Court Injury Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - Bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co. on May 7 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York objecting to a creditor&#39;s motion seeking to lift the automatic stay to pursue a state court lawsuit, arguing that the creditor shows no cause why the stay should be lifted (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; Bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co. on May 7 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York objecting to a creditor&#39;s motion seeking to lift the automatic stay to pursue a state court lawsuit, arguing that the creditor shows no cause why the stay should be lifted (In Re: Eastman Kodak Company, No. 12-10202, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1596"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/BANKRUPTCYLAW/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit.aspx" title="Kodak Objects To Lifting Of Automatic Stay To Allow State Court Injury Lawsuit">Kodak Objects To Lifting Of Automatic Stay To Allow State Court Injury Lawsuit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/kodak-objects-to-lifting-of-automatic-stay-to-allow-state-court-injury-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ConAgra: Hostess Should Not Be Allowed To Withdraw From Pension Funds</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - ConAgra Foods Inc. on May 7 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York objecting to bankrupt Hostess Brands Inc.&#39;s motion to withdraw from contributing to pension funds for its employees, contending that doing so would have "serious" financial consequences for other companies that contribute to the funds (In Re: Hostess Brands Inc., No. 12-22052, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; ConAgra Foods Inc. on May 7 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York objecting to bankrupt Hostess Brands Inc.&#39;s motion to withdraw from contributing to pension funds for its employees, contending that doing so would have &#8220;serious&#8221; financial consequences for other companies that contribute to the funds (In Re: Hostess Brands Inc., No. 12-22052, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1595"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds.aspx" title="ConAgra: Hostess Should Not Be Allowed To Withdraw From Pension Funds">ConAgra: Hostess Should Not Be Allowed To Withdraw From Pension Funds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/conagra-hostess-should-not-be-allowed-to-withdraw-from-pension-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Bankruptcy Judge: Tribune May Award $45M In Bonuses If Goal Is Met</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WILIMINGTON, Del. - The bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 proceeding of Tribune Co. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 4 approved the company&#39;s motion to award as much as $45 million in bonuses if financial goals are achieved (In Re: Tribune Company, No. 08-13141, Chapter 11, D. Del. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WILIMINGTON, Del. &#8211; The bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 proceeding of Tribune Co. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 4 approved the company&#39;s motion to award as much as $45 million in bonuses if financial goals are achieved (In Re: Tribune Company, No. 08-13141, Chapter 11, D. Del. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1594"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met.aspx" title="Federal Bankruptcy Judge: Tribune May Award $45M In Bonuses If Goal Is Met">Federal Bankruptcy Judge: Tribune May Award $45M In Bonuses If Goal Is Met</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/federal-bankruptcy-judge-tribune-may-award-45m-in-bonuses-if-goal-is-met/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Judge: Getty May Reject 814 Gas Station Leases, Effective Immediately</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - The federal bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 case of Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. (GPMI) on May 1 authorized GPMI to reject property leases for 814 of its gas stations, effective immediately (In Re: Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc., No. 11-15606, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; The federal bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 case of Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. (GPMI) on May 1 authorized GPMI to reject property leases for 814 of its gas stations, effective immediately (In Re: Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc., No. 11-15606, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1593"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately.aspx" title="Bankruptcy Judge: Getty May Reject 814 Gas Station Leases, Effective Immediately">Bankruptcy Judge: Getty May Reject 814 Gas Station Leases, Effective Immediately</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-judge-getty-may-reject-814-gas-station-leases-effective-immediately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borders Liquidating Trustee Objects To Proofs Of Claim</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - The trustee for the Borders Group Inc. (BGI) Liquidating Trust, which was formed in the wake of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of former bookseller Borders Group Inc., on May 1 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York opposing all proofs of claim asserted by its creditors (In Re: BGI Inc. f/k/a Borders Group Inc., No. 11-10614, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; The trustee for the Borders Group Inc. (BGI) Liquidating Trust, which was formed in the wake of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of former bookseller Borders Group Inc., on May 1 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York opposing all proofs of claim asserted by its creditors (In Re: BGI Inc. f/k/a Borders Group Inc., No. 11-10614, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1590"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim.aspx" title="Borders Liquidating Trustee Objects To Proofs Of Claim">Borders Liquidating Trustee Objects To Proofs Of Claim</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/borders-liquidating-trustee-objects-to-proofs-of-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Court OKs $2.5M In Post-Petition Funds For Fashion House Betsey Johnson</title>
		<link>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson/</link>
		<comments>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Bankruptcy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/uncategorized/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK - The federal bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of fashion house Betsey Johnson LLC on May 10 approved an additional $2.5 million in post-petition financing to be used strictly for payroll and working capital purposes (In Re: Betsey Johnson LLC, No. 12-11732, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <a href="http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8211; The federal bankruptcy judge presiding over the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of fashion house Betsey Johnson LLC on May 10 approved an additional $2.5 million in post-petition financing to be used strictly for payroll and working capital purposes (In Re: Betsey Johnson LLC, No. 12-11732, Chapter 11, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).  <span id="more-1589"></span></p>
<p>Read more about this topic:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/blogs/mealeys/archive/2012/05/17/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson.aspx" title="Bankruptcy Court OKs $2.5M In Post-Petition Funds For Fashion House Betsey Johnson">Bankruptcy Court OKs $2.5M In Post-Petition Funds For Fashion House Betsey Johnson</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardbankruptcy.com/05/17/2012/bankruptcy-news/bankruptcy-court-oks-2-5m-in-post-petition-funds-for-fashion-house-betsey-johnson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

